Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, rollback
19,371
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 102:
Line 102: + +
→Immigration policy: good idea
There is nothing in this article concerning Australia's successful policy for stopping illegal immigration.[https://ricochet.com/archives/how-australia-stopped-illegal-immigration/][http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/06/australia-returns-illegal-immigrants-to-sri-lanka-refuses-asylum-consideration/] Australia has been very tough on illegal immigration, and illegal immigration rates have been virtually zero the past two years (they had been surging before, like in the U.S.). We should mention the successful policy somewhere. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:03, 18 August 2016 (EDT)
There is nothing in this article concerning Australia's successful policy for stopping illegal immigration.[https://ricochet.com/archives/how-australia-stopped-illegal-immigration/][http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/06/australia-returns-illegal-immigrants-to-sri-lanka-refuses-asylum-consideration/] Australia has been very tough on illegal immigration, and illegal immigration rates have been virtually zero the past two years (they had been surging before, like in the U.S.). We should mention the successful policy somewhere. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 19:03, 18 August 2016 (EDT)
:That sounds like a great idea! Perhaps it could be added to the [[Australia#Immigrants|immigrants section]]? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 19:17, 18 August 2016 (EDT)