The 1952 provincial election in British Columbia stunned the pundits when Social Credit defeated the established parties to form a minority government. Commentators thought that the freakish rise of Social Credit was merely a protest against political misrule, but W. A. C. Bennett remained premier until 1972, and the party also governed 1975 to 1991. Hak (2004) argues Social Credit victories in the Fraser Valley and the interior, where the party was most successful, represented a populist revolt in a time of rapid economic change. The BC party rested upon a group of political activists who lean to a definite centre-right position on the political spectrum.<ref>Gordon Hak, "Populism and the 1952 Social Credit Breakthrough in British Columbia." ''Canadian Historical Review'' (2004) 85(2): 277-296. Issn: 0008-3755 Fulltext: in Project Muse; Donald E. Blake, R. K. Carty, Lynda K. Erickson, ''Grassroots Politicians: Party Activists in British Columbia.'' (1991) p. 55</ref> | The 1952 provincial election in British Columbia stunned the pundits when Social Credit defeated the established parties to form a minority government. Commentators thought that the freakish rise of Social Credit was merely a protest against political misrule, but W. A. C. Bennett remained premier until 1972, and the party also governed 1975 to 1991. Hak (2004) argues Social Credit victories in the Fraser Valley and the interior, where the party was most successful, represented a populist revolt in a time of rapid economic change. The BC party rested upon a group of political activists who lean to a definite centre-right position on the political spectrum.<ref>Gordon Hak, "Populism and the 1952 Social Credit Breakthrough in British Columbia." ''Canadian Historical Review'' (2004) 85(2): 277-296. Issn: 0008-3755 Fulltext: in Project Muse; Donald E. Blake, R. K. Carty, Lynda K. Erickson, ''Grassroots Politicians: Party Activists in British Columbia.'' (1991) p. 55</ref> |