| Line 36: |
Line 36: |
| | | | |
| | In 2010, the worldwide atheist community was challenged to a debate by [[Creation Ministries International]] as prominent atheists were speaking at a 2010 global atheist convention in [[Australia]].<ref name="truefree">Ammi, Ken (May 2010). [http://www.truefreethinker.com/articles/richard-dawkins-cowardly-clown "Richard Dawkins the cowardly clown"]. True Freethinker. Retrieved on July 30, 2014.</ref> [[Richard Dawkins]], [[PZ Myers]] and other prominent atheists refused to debate Creation Ministries International.<ref name="truefree"/> | | In 2010, the worldwide atheist community was challenged to a debate by [[Creation Ministries International]] as prominent atheists were speaking at a 2010 global atheist convention in [[Australia]].<ref name="truefree">Ammi, Ken (May 2010). [http://www.truefreethinker.com/articles/richard-dawkins-cowardly-clown "Richard Dawkins the cowardly clown"]. True Freethinker. Retrieved on July 30, 2014.</ref> [[Richard Dawkins]], [[PZ Myers]] and other prominent atheists refused to debate Creation Ministries International.<ref name="truefree"/> |
| − | Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates and many have been held since the 1970's particularly in the [[United States]].<ref name="AnkerFraser">Multiple references: | + | Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates and many have been held since the 1970s particularly in the [[United States]].<ref name="AnkerFraser">Multiple references: |
| | *Ankerberg, John, and Weldon, John (1998). [http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC0104W1E.htm "Truth in advertising: damaging the cause of science"]. ''Darwin's Leap of Faith'' (Harvest House). Retrieved from The John Ankenberg Show website on May 15, 2015. | | *Ankerberg, John, and Weldon, John (1998). [http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC0104W1E.htm "Truth in advertising: damaging the cause of science"]. ''Darwin's Leap of Faith'' (Harvest House). Retrieved from The John Ankenberg Show website on May 15, 2015. |
| | *Fraser, William A. (2003). [http://web.archive.org/web/20091024005313/http://members.shaw.ca/mark.64/hcib/whowins.html "Who wins the debates?"] Mark64's webpage. Retrieved from October 24, 2009 archive at Internet Archive on May 15, 2015.</ref> | | *Fraser, William A. (2003). [http://web.archive.org/web/20091024005313/http://members.shaw.ca/mark.64/hcib/whowins.html "Who wins the debates?"] Mark64's webpage. Retrieved from October 24, 2009 archive at Internet Archive on May 15, 2015.</ref> |
| | Robert Sloan, Director of Paleontology at the University of Minnesota, reluctantly admitted to a ''Wall Street Journal'' reporter that the "creationists tend to win" the public debates which focused on the creation vs. [[theory of evolution|evolution]] controversy.<ref name="AnkerFraser"/> In August 1979, [[Henry Morris|Dr. Henry Morris]] reported in an [[Institute for Creation Research]] letter the following: “By now, practically every leading evolutionary scientist in this country has declined one or more invitations to a scientific debate on creation/evolution.”<ref>Fraser, William A. (2003). [http://web.archive.org/web/20091024005313/http://members.shaw.ca/mark.64/hcib/whowins.html "Who wins the debates?"] Mark64's webpage. Retrieved from October 24, 2009 archive at Internet Archive on May 15, 2015.</ref> Morris also said regarding the creation scientist [[Duane Gish]] (who had over 300 formal debates): “At least in our judgment and that of most in the audiences, he always wins.”<ref>Ankerberg, John, and Weldon, John (1998). [http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC1200W1.htm "Voices for evolution"]. ''Darwin's Leap of Faith'' (Harvest House). Retrieved from the John Ankerberg show website on May 15, 2015.</ref> | | Robert Sloan, Director of Paleontology at the University of Minnesota, reluctantly admitted to a ''Wall Street Journal'' reporter that the "creationists tend to win" the public debates which focused on the creation vs. [[theory of evolution|evolution]] controversy.<ref name="AnkerFraser"/> In August 1979, [[Henry Morris|Dr. Henry Morris]] reported in an [[Institute for Creation Research]] letter the following: “By now, practically every leading evolutionary scientist in this country has declined one or more invitations to a scientific debate on creation/evolution.”<ref>Fraser, William A. (2003). [http://web.archive.org/web/20091024005313/http://members.shaw.ca/mark.64/hcib/whowins.html "Who wins the debates?"] Mark64's webpage. Retrieved from October 24, 2009 archive at Internet Archive on May 15, 2015.</ref> Morris also said regarding the creation scientist [[Duane Gish]] (who had over 300 formal debates): “At least in our judgment and that of most in the audiences, he always wins.”<ref>Ankerberg, John, and Weldon, John (1998). [http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC1200W1.htm "Voices for evolution"]. ''Darwin's Leap of Faith'' (Harvest House). Retrieved from the John Ankerberg show website on May 15, 2015.</ref> |
| − | Generally speaking, leading evolutionists generally no longer debate creation scientists because [[creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]].<ref>Morris, Henry, Ph. D. (1996). [http://www.icr.org/article/811/ "Reason or rhetoric"]. ''Acts and Facts'', vol. 25, no. 11. Retrieved from Institute for Creation Research website on May 15, 2015.</ref> In addition, the [[atheism|atheist]] and evolutionist, [[Richard Dawkins]] has shown inconsistent and deceptive behavior [[Richard Dawkins' public refusal to debate creationists|concerning his refusal creation scientists]]. In an article entitled "Are Kansas Evolutionists Afraid of a Fair Debate?" the [[Discovery Institute]] states the following: | + | Generally speaking, leading evolutionists generally no longer debate creation scientists because [[creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]].<ref>Morris, Henry, Ph. D. (1996). [http://www.icr.org/article/811/ "Reason or rhetoric"]. ''Acts and Facts'', vol. 25, no. 11. Retrieved from Institute for Creation Research website on May 15, 2015.</ref> In addition, the atheist and evolutionist, [[Richard Dawkins]] has shown inconsistent and deceptive behavior [[Richard Dawkins' public refusal to debate creationists|concerning his refusal creation scientists]]. In an article entitled "Are Kansas Evolutionists Afraid of a Fair Debate?" the [[Discovery Institute]] states the following: |
| | {{cquote|Defenders of Darwin's theory of evolution typically proclaim that evidence for their theory is simply overwhelming. If they really believe that, you would think they would jump at a chance to publicly explain some of that overwhelming evidence to the public. Apparently not.<ref>West, John G. (February 23, 2005). [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/02/are_kansas_evolutionists_afraid_of_a_fai.html "Are Kansas evolutionists afraid of a fair debate?"] Evolution News and Views. Retrieved on May 15, 2015.</ref>}} | | {{cquote|Defenders of Darwin's theory of evolution typically proclaim that evidence for their theory is simply overwhelming. If they really believe that, you would think they would jump at a chance to publicly explain some of that overwhelming evidence to the public. Apparently not.<ref>West, John G. (February 23, 2005). [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/02/are_kansas_evolutionists_afraid_of_a_fai.html "Are Kansas evolutionists afraid of a fair debate?"] Evolution News and Views. Retrieved on May 15, 2015.</ref>}} |
| | [[Image:PH2006022801720.jpg|right|thumb|150px|[[Henry Morris]]]] | | [[Image:PH2006022801720.jpg|right|thumb|150px|[[Henry Morris]]]] |
| Line 74: |
Line 74: |
| | [[Jerry Coyne]] is an evolutionary biology professor and atheist who runs a leading pro-evolution blog. | | [[Jerry Coyne]] is an evolutionary biology professor and atheist who runs a leading pro-evolution blog. |
| | | | |
| − | In terms of its ideology the Templeton Foundation is non-profit foundation which espouses both conservative and liberal positions (As far as [[conservatism]], it promotes [[theism]] and [[capitalism]]. In terms of liberal ideology it supports theistic evolution.). | + | In terms of its ideology the Templeton Foundation is non-profit foundation which espouses both conservative and liberal positions (As far as [[conservatism]], it promotes theism and [[capitalism]]. In terms of liberal ideology it supports theistic evolution.). |
| | | | |
| | In terms of liberal ideology The Templeton Foundation helps fund the Biologos Foundation which promotes [[theistic evolution]]. Dr. [[Francis Collins]], an ex-atheist who became a Roman Catholic heads the Biologos Foundation. [[Pope Benedict XVI]] has also appointed Collins to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. Collins has been criticized by pro-life advocates for some for his views on aborting babies with learning disabilities.<ref>[http://touchstonemag.com/merecomments/2009/07/francis-collinss-devout-views-on-abortion/ Francis Collins’s “Devout” Views on Abortion]</ref> | | In terms of liberal ideology The Templeton Foundation helps fund the Biologos Foundation which promotes [[theistic evolution]]. Dr. [[Francis Collins]], an ex-atheist who became a Roman Catholic heads the Biologos Foundation. [[Pope Benedict XVI]] has also appointed Collins to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. Collins has been criticized by pro-life advocates for some for his views on aborting babies with learning disabilities.<ref>[http://touchstonemag.com/merecomments/2009/07/francis-collinss-devout-views-on-abortion/ Francis Collins’s “Devout” Views on Abortion]</ref> |