Changes

::: It is pretty clear that [[User:TimS]] has plainly pointed out what is going on. A quick view of the article's edit history [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientology&action=history] illustrates what he says.  Further, the exact photo that Wikipedia once used to gently introduce readers to the slanderous presentation at wikipedia was introduced here.  When I say "slanderous" I mean exactly that.  The Wikipedia editors include people who have a history of lawsuit, with the the Church of Scientology, such people run personal webistes on the very edge of legal and simotaneously edit Wikipedia's Scientology series articles.  The photo was introduced there, as it has been introduced here.  Tmtoulouse seems quite happy to see the article marching down a roadway toward slander and mis-statement, JoyousOne does not understand how Joyous' opinion is not what the Church means when it says, ''In Scientology no one is asked to accept anything as belief or on faith. That which is true for you is what you have observed to be true''. Yet do either discuss the issues that drive their changes to the article? Alas, no, neither do.  THAT is what [[User:TimS]] is talking about. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 15:54, 25 April 2007 (EDT)

::: It is pretty clear that [[User:TimS]] has plainly pointed out what is going on. A quick view of the article's edit history [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientology&action=history] illustrates what he says.  Further, the exact photo that Wikipedia once used to gently introduce readers to the slanderous presentation at wikipedia was introduced here.  When I say "slanderous" I mean exactly that.  The Wikipedia editors include people who have a history of lawsuit, with the the Church of Scientology, such people run personal webistes on the very edge of legal and simotaneously edit Wikipedia's Scientology series articles.  The photo was introduced there, as it has been introduced here.  Tmtoulouse seems quite happy to see the article marching down a roadway toward slander and mis-statement, JoyousOne does not understand how Joyous' opinion is not what the Church means when it says, ''In Scientology no one is asked to accept anything as belief or on faith. That which is true for you is what you have observed to be true''. Yet do either discuss the issues that drive their changes to the article? Alas, no, neither do.  THAT is what [[User:TimS]] is talking about. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 15:54, 25 April 2007 (EDT)

 

::I tried to clean it up a little, Tim, I hope this helps.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 15:51, 25 April 2007 (EDT)

::I tried to clean it up a little, Tim, I hope this helps.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 15:51, 25 April 2007 (EDT)