999
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 163:
Line 163: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Generalizations
::: Scientology does not state that anyone should believe the earth is a million, billion or 95 billion years old. Hubbard did not state the information he wrote and lectured as "beliefs". He stated what he knew to be true. A person who studies what he wrote and said may do whatever they like with his stated word. There is no belief that makes one a scientologist. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 17:02, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::: Scientology does not state that anyone should believe the earth is a million, billion or 95 billion years old. Hubbard did not state the information he wrote and lectured as "beliefs". He stated what he knew to be true. A person who studies what he wrote and said may do whatever they like with his stated word. There is no belief that makes one a scientologist. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 17:02, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::But isn't this a direct quote from some of their writings?
::" The following portion of OT 3 is quoted in full in Margery Wakefield's book The Road to Xenu, chapter 13, and I believe all of it has been quoted in other books and articles as well. It provides a nice context for my summary and comments:
::The head of the Galactic Federation (76 planets around larger
stars visible from here) (founded 95,000,000 years ago, very
space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet,
178 billion on average) by mass implanting. He caused people to
be brought to Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H-Bomb on the
principal volcanos (Incident II) and then the Pacific area ones
were taken in boxes to Hawaii and the Atlantic area ones to
Las Palmas and there "packaged".
::His name was Xenu. He used renegades. Various misleading
data by means of circuits etc. was placed in the implants."
::Also, doesn't scientology have a kind of bible? or am I totally wrong here? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 17:05, 25 April 2007 (EDT)