Changes

2.  The entry for the Renaissance in Wikipedia refuses to give any credit to Christianity.

2.  The entry for the Renaissance in Wikipedia refuses to give any credit to Christianity.

3.  A Wikipedia editor who edits under the names "Nearly Headless Nick" and a phony name "Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington" apparently deleted the entire Conservapedia entry on Wikipedia.  His own user page says he "died on October 31, 1492 and is the resident ghost of Gryffindor tower."  Wikipedia is controlled by editors like these?! This reflects a bias towards silliness.

3.  A Wikipedia editor who edits under the names "Nearly Headless Nick" and a phony name "Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington" apparently deleted the entire Conservapedia entry on Wikipedia.  His own user page says he "died on October 31, 1492 and is the resident ghost of Gryffindor tower."  Wikipedia is controlled by editors like these?! This reflects an indifference towards silliness.

4.  There is a strong anti-American and anti-capitalism bias on Wikipedia.  In its description of the post-war Bell Trade Act of 1946, in which the United States gave the Philippines $800 million in exchange for some free trade provisions, Wikipedia omits any mention of the $800 million dollars and instead lambasts the "wrath of Father Capitalism."<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Trade_Act</ref>  The agreement was approved by popular vote on the Philippines, but the Wikipedia article omits that fact also.

4.  There is a strong anti-American and anti-capitalism bias on Wikipedia.  In its description of the post-war Bell Trade Act of 1946, in which the United States gave the Philippines $800 million in exchange for some free trade provisions, Wikipedia omits any mention of the $800 million dollars and instead lambasts the "wrath of Father Capitalism."<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Trade_Act</ref>  The agreement was approved by popular vote on the Philippines, but the Wikipedia article omits that fact also.

20. Wikipedia's article about the late Senator John Tower includes a mean-spirited story whose only point seems to be to indicate the degree of his ex-wife's bitterness toward him. The article spells his wife's name incorrectly, and cites no source for the item. The item has been in that state since it was first inserted in May 2006.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Tower&oldid=101859325 John Tower], revision as of Jan 25</ref>  No real encyclopedia would print such silly gossip.

20. Wikipedia's article about the late Senator John Tower includes a mean-spirited story whose only point seems to be to indicate the degree of his ex-wife's bitterness toward him. The article spells his wife's name incorrectly, and cites no source for the item. The item has been in that state since it was first inserted in May 2006.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Tower&oldid=101859325 John Tower], revision as of Jan 25</ref>  No real encyclopedia would print such silly gossip.

22. Wikipedia distorts the youthful acceptance of [[deism]] by [[Benjamin Franklin]] by never acknowledging that he later abandoned it.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Deist_thinkers</ref> This is typical of an anti-Christian bias in Wikipedia.

22. Wikipedia distorts the youthful acceptance of [[deism]] by [[Benjamin Franklin]] by never acknowledging that he later abandoned it.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Deist_thinkers</ref>  

== References ==

== References ==