Changes

:Currently, at 66,000 plus bytes, the article just isn't long enough? for a split of content.  That would assume a goal of several pages, all having 66,000 plus bytes worth of content give or take.  The [[Barack Hussein Obama]] (series of) page(s) provides a good enough example of what I have in mind. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 22:34, 21 May 2016 (EDT)

:Currently, at 66,000 plus bytes, the article just isn't long enough? for a split of content.  That would assume a goal of several pages, all having 66,000 plus bytes worth of content give or take.  The [[Barack Hussein Obama]] (series of) page(s) provides a good enough example of what I have in mind. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 22:34, 21 May 2016 (EDT)

:::Re: Alinsky. I don't believe she's s true Alinsksyite radical. And I base this on a careful stufy of her life and career. Primarily, her 1993 talk at her old high school recounting how she was assigned to play Lyndon Johnson in a mock debate and "forced" to study views that were not her own then leaving for Wellsley with a [https://youtu.be/WycwDYlOCDw differnt kind of attitude and inquiry], and secondly thr ''NYT'' apologetic that says she rejected campus radicalism of her peers and chose to [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/05/us/politics/05clinton.html work within the system]. In 1996 she reiterated to NPR her views are rooted in the conservstivism she grew up with. Alinsky was easily accessible for interviews in her hometown Chicago, and writing on him aided in convincing her peers she was a leftist radical. The only enduring Alinsky precept she made her own was the doctrine of demonization of enemies. But her views are purely her own, neither "dogmatically Republican or dogmatically Democratic, liberal or conservative". I would characterize them as dogmatically self-serving and corrupt, but I may be a little cynical and biased.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']]} 15:32, 2 September 2016 (EDT)

:::Re: Alinsky. I don't believe she's s true Alinsksyite radical. And I base this on a careful study of her life and career. Primarily, her 1993 talk at her old high school recounting how she was assigned to play Lyndon Johnson in a mock debate and "forced" to study views that were not her own then leaving for Wellsley with a [https://youtu.be/WycwDYlOCDw differnt kind of attitude and inquiry], and secondly the ''NYT'' apologetic that says she rejected campus radicalism of her peers and chose to [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/05/us/politics/05clinton.html work within the system]. In 1996 she reiterated to NPR her views are rooted in the conservativism she grew up with. Alinsky was easily accessible for interviews in her hometown Chicago, and writing on him aided in convincing her peers she was a leftist radical. The only enduring Alinsky precept she made her own was the doctrine of demonization of enemies. But her views are purely her own, neither "dogmatically Republican or dogmatically Democratic, liberal or conservative". I would characterize them as dogmatically self-serving and corrupt, but I may be a little cynical and biased.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']]} 15:32, 2 September 2016 (EDT)

::Progressingamerica, no apologies needed. And I am glad you found my comeuppance of the self-absorbed, Mr. "$60.00 an hour" amusing.  I have my doubts that my message to him will cause his attitude to change, but perhaps it will. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:15, 22 May 2016 (EDT)

::Progressingamerica, no apologies needed. And I am glad you found my comeuppance of the self-absorbed, Mr. "$60.00 an hour" amusing.  I have my doubts that my message to him will cause his attitude to change, but perhaps it will. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:15, 22 May 2016 (EDT)