SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 154:
Line 154: − + Line 162:
Line 162: + + + + + + +
→Einstein’s Relativity and Relativism: Why Einstein’s theory of relativity is actually a powerful argument for absolute truth.: apology
Please read the article [http://evangelicalfocus.com/blogs/1297/Einsteins_Relativity_and_Relativism Einstein’s Relativity and Relativism: Why Einstein’s theory of relativity is actually a powerful argument for absolute truth.] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:55, 11 February 2016 (EST)
Please read the article [http://evangelicalfocus.com/blogs/1297/Einsteins_Relativity_and_Relativism Einstein’s Relativity and Relativism: Why Einstein’s theory of relativity is actually a powerful argument for absolute truth.] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:55, 11 February 2016 (EST)
:I don't see how this relates to the equation E=mc^2. Is this connection between Evangelical Christianity and Einsteinian Relativity something that you want people to see? If so, I would suggest finding an appropriate main space (or essay space) page for it. A talk page, especially a talk page for an equation, doesn't seem to be the right place to publicize a profound insight on absolute truth. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 15:12, 11 February 2016 (EST)
:<s>I don't see how this relates to the equation E=mc^2. Is this connection between Evangelical Christianity and Einsteinian Relativity something that you want people to see?</s> If so, I would suggest finding an appropriate main space (or essay space) page for it. A talk page, especially a talk page for an equation, doesn't seem to be the right place to publicize a profound insight on absolute truth. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 15:12, 11 February 2016 (EST)
::SamHB, you are being inaccurate and mischaracterizing the article.
::SamHB, you are being inaccurate and mischaracterizing the article.
::If you are going to respond to a talk page post, please do it more thoughtfully and with greater honesty. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:51, 11 February 2016 (EST)
::If you are going to respond to a talk page post, please do it more thoughtfully and with greater honesty. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:51, 11 February 2016 (EST)
:::Cons, I apologize for what I wrote above. I did not read the article that you cited—I very rarely read articles that you cite on websites of that sort. I simply assumed that, if the website was at "evangelicalfocus.com", and is about relativity vs. relativism, and you put this on the E=mc^2 page, that it related to Evangelical Christianity and Einsteinian Relativity. That was an unwarranted assumption on my part. I'll take your word for it that the article was about absolute truth. And I agree with you that lots of people, not just evangelicals, support absolute truth. For example, I do.
:::But if you want people to see that article, I still think there are better places to cite it than here.
:::I'm sorry. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:12, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
== Re: the Einstein picture ==
== Re: the Einstein picture ==