Changes

In '''''Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore''''', 439 U.S. 322, 335-337 (1979), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[issue preclusion]] absent mutuality of parties does not violate the [[Seventh Amendment]], even though [[common law]] as it existed in 1791 permitted [[issue preclusion]] only when there was mutuality).

In '''''Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore''''', 439 U.S. 322, 335-337 (1979), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[issue preclusion]] absent mutuality of parties does not violate the [[Seventh Amendment]], even though [[common law]] as it existed in 1791 permitted [[issue preclusion]] only when there was mutuality.

Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]] was the sole dissent, lamenting the Court opinion as follows:

Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]] was the sole dissent, lamenting the Court opinion as follows: