Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 176:
Line 176:
− +
− +
Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 13:15, September 5, 2016
, 13:15, September 5, 2016Fixed terminology
|February 27, 2011
|February 27, 2011
|"Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravity waves predicted by the theory, none have ever been found."<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=852797</ref>
|"Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravity waves predicted by the theory, none have ever been found."<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=852797</ref>
|Gravity waves have been found! - liberals asserted, referring to the "BICEP2" measurements in 2014.
|Gravitational waves have been found! - liberals asserted, referring to the "BICEP2" measurements in 2014.
|''Nature'' states, in 2015, that the BICEP2 measurements are not reliable: "Gravitational waves discovery now officially dead."<ref>http://www.nature.com/news/gravitational-waves-discovery-now-officially-dead-1.16830</ref>
|''Nature'' states, in 2015, that the BICEP2 measurements are not reliable: "Gravitational waves discovery now officially dead."<ref>http://www.nature.com/news/gravitational-waves-discovery-now-officially-dead-1.16830</ref> However, there is a claim that they have now been found<ref>http://www.ligo.org/news/pressreleases.php</ref>
|January 21, 2016
|January 21, 2016
|-
|-
(username removed)