Changes

All of these arguments in favor of the supernatural against the doctrine of philosophical naturalism are dismissed by philosophical naturalists as having no validity because of their insistence ''a priori'' that the natural world is all there is and that the supernatural cannot exist but is a product of the human [[Mind|imagination]]. However, instantly rejecting a (''supernaturalist'') theory merely because it [[Inductive reasoning|infers]]

All of these arguments in favor of the supernatural against the doctrine of philosophical naturalism are dismissed by philosophical naturalists as having no validity because of their insistence ''a priori'' that the natural world is all there is and that the supernatural cannot exist but is a product of the human [[Mind|imagination]]. However, instantly rejecting a (''supernaturalist'') theory merely because it [[Inductive reasoning|infers]]

<ref>infer: To derive by reasoning; conclude or accept from evidence or premises; deduce; to involve, or imply as, a conclusion; give evidence of; to draw an inference, a deduction or conclusion. In science, to form an [[hypothesis]].

<ref>infer: To derive by reasoning; conclude or accept from evidence or premises; deduce; to involve, or imply as, a conclusion; give evidence of; to draw an inference, a deduction or conclusion. In science, to form an [[hypothesis]].

<br/>< L ''inferre'' to bring into < ''in-'' in + ''ferre'' to bring, carry]</ref>  

<br/>( L ''inferre'' to bring into < ''in-'' in + ''ferre'' to bring, carry)</ref>  

from the available evidence things that a conflicting (''naturalist'') theory would not infer is not logical and is not good [[science]], because the rejection is based on a prejudice which precludes objective and dispassionate examination of all the evidence with resultant neutral interpretation of facts ([[objectivity]]).

from the available evidence things that a conflicting (''naturalist'') theory would not infer is not logical and is not good [[science]], because the rejection is based on a prejudice which precludes objective and dispassionate examination of all the evidence with resultant neutral interpretation of facts ([[objectivity]]).