343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 169:
Line 169: + + Line 191:
Line 193: +
→Generalizations: response to Tmtlouse
::::So Scientology is just nothing then, guess they don't need that tax exemption after all. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 17:06, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::::So Scientology is just nothing then, guess they don't need that tax exemption after all. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 17:06, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::::: [[User:Tmtoulouse]], you have stated that you have "washed your hands" of this article. Yet you persist in opinionated, inflammatory comments that are not directed toward editor cooperation, nor to conflict resolution, nor toward understanding, nor are they attributed. Will you please act responsibily ? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 18:00, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::But isn't this a direct quote from some of their writings?
::But isn't this a direct quote from some of their writings?
None of the quotation you placed here is originated by the Church of Scientology. You got that quote from a critical website, which got its information from what it says are stolen documents. Why should anyone consider such a poor source of information to contribute to Conservapedia? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 17:11, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
None of the quotation you placed here is originated by the Church of Scientology. You got that quote from a critical website, which got its information from what it says are stolen documents. Why should anyone consider such a poor source of information to contribute to Conservapedia? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 17:11, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
==Belief==
==Belief==