Changes

'''Quasi-judicial immunity''' extends [[judicial immunity]] to persons who are integral parts of the judicial process, such as [[prosecutor]]s, court-appointed mediators and others lawfully acting or assisting in a judicial role.

'''Quasi-judicial immunity''' extends [[judicial immunity]] to persons who are integral parts of the judicial process, such as [[prosecutor]]s, court-appointed mediators and others lawfully acting or assisting in a judicial role.

It is an unsettled question whether equitable relief may be granted under [[Section 1983]] despite "quasi-judicial" immunity. Compare, e.g., ''[[Law Students Civil Rights Research Council v. Wadmond]]'', 299 F. Supp. 117, 123 (S.D.N.Y. 1969) (three-judge court), ''aff'd on other grounds'', 401 U.S. 154, 27 L. Ed. 2d 749, 91 S. Ct. 720 (1971) (Friendly, J.) ("We fail to perceive what interest would be served by holding federal courts to be powerless to enjoin state officers [from violating [[plaintiff]]s' [[civil rights]]] simply because some of them are robed and others have been appointed by these who are.") with ''[[Conover v. Montemuro]]'', 477 F.2d 1073, 1094 (3d Cir. 1973) (on rehearing en banc) (Adams, J.) (expressly reserving the question "whether the Montemuro, 477 F.2d 1073, 1094 (3d Cir. 1973) (on rehearing en judicial immunity doctrine is an absolute bar, a partial bar, or no bar at all in § 1983 suits for injunctive relief against state court judges").

It is an unsettled question whether equitable relief may be granted under [[Section 1983]] despite "quasi-judicial" immunity. Compare, e.g., ''[[Law Students Civil Rights Research Council v. Wadmond]]'', 299 F. Supp. 117, 123 (S.D.N.Y. 1969) (three-judge court), ''aff'd on other grounds'', 401 U.S. 154, 27 L. Ed. 2d 749, 91 S. Ct. 720 (1971) (Friendly, J.) ("We fail to perceive what interest would be served by holding federal courts to be powerless to enjoin state officers [from violating [[plaintiff]]s' [[civil rights]]] simply because some of them are robed and others have been appointed by these who are.") with ''[[Conover v. Montemuro]]'', 477 F.2d 1073, 1094 (3d Cir. 1973) (on rehearing en banc) (Adams, J.) expressly reserving the question "whether the Montemuro, 477 F.2d 1073, 1094 (3d Cir. 1973) (on rehearing en judicial immunity doctrine is an absolute bar, a partial bar, or no bar at all in § 1983 suits for injunctive relief against state court judges").

Note that "injunctive relief looks to the future." [[Dombrowski v. Pfister]], 380 U.S. 479, 485, 14 L. Ed. 2d 22, 85 S. Ct. 1116 (1965). In determining whether an applicant for injunctive relief has sufficiently demonstrated a threat of future harm, moreover, a court should bear in mind that such relief

Note that "injunctive relief looks to the future." [[Dombrowski v. Pfister]], 380 U.S. 479, 485, 14 L. Ed. 2d 22, 85 S. Ct. 1116 (1965). In determining whether an applicant for injunctive relief has sufficiently demonstrated a threat of future harm, moreover, a court should bear in mind that such relief