Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
647 bytes added ,  23:51, September 7, 2016
no edit summary
Line 164: Line 164:     
The majority of arguments for school sanctioned prayer that are mentioned here is, in my opinion, hypocritical.  In a hypothetical situation, if school sanctioned prayer were to be made legal again, and, say, a Wiccan teacher lead a class prayer, it would likely make the news, in which case the members of Conservapedia would probably give the situation a name (such as, "The Wiccan Indoctrination Fiasco") and then proceed to push for either religious discrimination against Wiccans or the re-establishment of the "no school-sanctioned prayer allowed" law.  --X. Dulks
 
The majority of arguments for school sanctioned prayer that are mentioned here is, in my opinion, hypocritical.  In a hypothetical situation, if school sanctioned prayer were to be made legal again, and, say, a Wiccan teacher lead a class prayer, it would likely make the news, in which case the members of Conservapedia would probably give the situation a name (such as, "The Wiccan Indoctrination Fiasco") and then proceed to push for either religious discrimination against Wiccans or the re-establishment of the "no school-sanctioned prayer allowed" law.  --X. Dulks
 +
 +
== A liberal's point of view ==
 +
Tbh I only came here to debate conservatives, but anyways,
 +
You guys dont actually think that the country should sponsor enforced school prayer, right? In any context forcing classroom prayer isn't a good idea, because, obviously, religious minorities exist and they deserve the right not to pray to a god/gods they don't believe exist. And also on the topic of teachers leading school prayer, I am obviously against that as well for the reasons I already mentioned. The only way in which I would support class prayer is in the context of a student's right to pray to themselves in a session not lead by any staff.
(username removed)

Navigation menu