1,106
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 209:
Line 209: +
no edit summary
:::Seems a tad [[Seung-Hui Cho | dangerous]] to me. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 18:21, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Seems a tad [[Seung-Hui Cho | dangerous]] to me. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 18:21, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:::: If free thought seems a tad [[Seung-Hui Cho | dangerous]] to you, why are you editing here? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 18:39, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:::: If free thought seems a tad [[Seung-Hui Cho | dangerous]] to you, why are you editing here? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 18:39, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::Free thought does not mean that truth is relative to the individual. I believe in an absolute external truth. Just like the site founder and most of the editors. We disagree on how to become closer to that Truth but we both believe it there. I am here to participate in that path. If all truth is relative to the individual..........well there is a 1000 years of philosophy behind why that is problematic. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 18:41, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:Im sorry again, Terry, but you misunderstand me. Of course my children are free to choose their beliefs, and, thank God, they have chosen to be Christians. Had they NOT chosen to be Christians, they would not be Christians. I hate to state the obvious, but sometimes it is necessary.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 18:24, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:Im sorry again, Terry, but you misunderstand me. Of course my children are free to choose their beliefs, and, thank God, they have chosen to be Christians. Had they NOT chosen to be Christians, they would not be Christians. I hate to state the obvious, but sometimes it is necessary.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 18:24, 25 April 2007 (EDT)