Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
218 bytes removed ,  15:55, September 10, 2016
m
→‎Appeal to Consequences: clear up wording, remove non-sequitur, remove unneeded third example
Line 35: Line 35:  
* Therefore, evolution is false
 
* Therefore, evolution is false
   −
This argument commits the ''appeal to consequences'' fallacy because it provides no evidence for its conclusion; all it does is appeal to the consequences of believing in evolution.  Evolution is not disproven solely because it leads to bad consequences for those who believe in it.  The following is a similar example:
+
This argument commits the ''appeal to consequences'' fallacy because it provides no evidence for its conclusion; all it does is appeal to the consequences of believing in evolution.  Evolution is not disproven because it leads to bad consequences for those who believe in it.  The following is a similar example:
    
* If you believe in evolution, then you'll be more respected in academic circles
 
* If you believe in evolution, then you'll be more respected in academic circles
 
* Therefore, evolution is true
 
* Therefore, evolution is true
   −
This makes an appeal to the positive consequences of believing in evolution, without actually providing any proof of evolution itself.  Just because belief in evolution makes you more respected by [[liberal]] professors, this does not mean that evolution is correct.
+
This makes an appeal to the positive consequences of believing in evolution, without actually providing any proof of evolution itself.  Just because belief in evolution makes you more respected in acedemic circles, this does not mean that evolution is correct.
−
 
  −
To use a more extreme example, but one doubtless familiar from everyday life, the mere fact that a child's belief in [[Santa Claus]] can have positive consequences does not prove that Santa Claus exists.
      
A particular form of the appeal to consequences is the [[appeal to personal interest]], which is fallacy of appealing to the personal likes and interests (preferences, prejudices, predispositions, fears, etc.) of others in order to have an argument accepted, when those personal likes and interests are irrelevant to the truth or falsity of the argument.
 
A particular form of the appeal to consequences is the [[appeal to personal interest]], which is fallacy of appealing to the personal likes and interests (preferences, prejudices, predispositions, fears, etc.) of others in order to have an argument accepted, when those personal likes and interests are irrelevant to the truth or falsity of the argument.
5,580

edits

Navigation menu