SkipCaptcha
731
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + + + + +
Talk:Marquis de Sade (view source)
Revision as of 18:00, September 10, 2016
, 18:00, September 10, 2016→This Sentence Appears to be obviously false: new section
I'm not sourcing the quote I added because I don't want anyone stumbling upon this page actually reading the book. I've read part of it with a pure, unwavering Christian heart to understand the depths of human evil, but I don't want anyone who doesn't have these qualities exposed to such a potentially corrupting novel. --[[User:Pious|Pious]] 02:25, 27 July 2016 (CDT)
I'm not sourcing the quote I added because I don't want anyone stumbling upon this page actually reading the book. I've read part of it with a pure, unwavering Christian heart to understand the depths of human evil, but I don't want anyone who doesn't have these qualities exposed to such a potentially corrupting novel. --[[User:Pious|Pious]] 02:25, 27 July 2016 (CDT)
== This Sentence Appears to be obviously false ==
Article says:
:"The 120 Days of Sodom, perhaps his most notorious book, was written by the Marquis whilst imprisoned in the Bastille, where he witnessed daily executions from his window during the Reign of Terror.
Was not the Bastille was destroyed (1789) before the Reign of Terror (1793-94)? If so, how could de Sade have watched the Reign of Terror from the Bastille??? ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 14:00, 10 September 2016 (EDT))