Changes

|November 28, 2009<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=724599</ref>

|November 28, 2009<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=724599</ref>

|Conservapedia asserts that the [[Theory of relativity]] is false, and creates the page [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], initially containing 10 counterexamples.  By late 2015 the number will have grown to 48.

|Conservapedia asserts that the [[Theory of relativity]] is false, and creates the page [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], initially containing 10 counterexamples.  By late 2015 the number will have grown to 48.

|a barrage of public criticism against anyone who even questions the unproven theory; no one seeking a PhD or tenure dare express doubts about the theory

|Widespread ridicule all across the internet.  98% of Google hits are sarcastic.  No one who questions the well-established theory would get employment as a high school science teacher, much less a PhD or college tenure.

|A ''New Scientist'' article, entitled "Breaking relativity," declares that celestial signals defy the theory

|A ''New Scientist'' article, entitled "Breaking relativity," declares that celestial signals defy the theory

|January 2, 2014

|January 2, 2014