Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
289 bytes added ,  18:16, September 13, 2016
Line 133: Line 133:     
I reverted a change made by Ed Poor on this page about whether we should credit Popper with establishing the doctrine.  I wanted to explain on his talk page but it is protected.  Anyway I provided a source, but the main reason I think we can credit him is because I remember that his work on falsifiability stemmed primarily from his dissatisfaction with Marxian and Freudian "scientific" approaches to history and psychoanalysis.  He was not the first person to 'mention' falsifiability but he was the first person to systemize the concept and apply it to show the folly of systems which explain everything and yet nothing.  I think we can fairly give it to him.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 13:15, 13 February 2012 (EST)
 
I reverted a change made by Ed Poor on this page about whether we should credit Popper with establishing the doctrine.  I wanted to explain on his talk page but it is protected.  Anyway I provided a source, but the main reason I think we can credit him is because I remember that his work on falsifiability stemmed primarily from his dissatisfaction with Marxian and Freudian "scientific" approaches to history and psychoanalysis.  He was not the first person to 'mention' falsifiability but he was the first person to systemize the concept and apply it to show the folly of systems which explain everything and yet nothing.  I think we can fairly give it to him.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 13:15, 13 February 2012 (EST)
 +
 +
== Stephen Hawking ==
 +
 +
I removed the part about Stephen Hawking as it was not clear what exactly the article is talking about (it just said much of the work of). Also what work of his is not pseudoscience? [[User:Stevel|Stevel]] ([[User talk:Stevel|talk]]) 14:16, 13 September 2016 (EDT)
6

edits

Navigation menu