Changes

The Einsteinian universe theory (EUT), is a theory of universe from which the "expansion of univrese" was eliminated through the calculation of [[intrinsic redshift]], that showed that the alleged expansion is a relativistic illusion due to the curvature of space.  

The Einsteinian universe theory (EUT), is a theory of universe from which the "expansion of univrese" was eliminated through the calculation of [[intrinsic redshift]], that showed that the alleged expansion is a relativistic illusion due to the curvature of space.  

The EUT is almost the same as Einstein's stationary model universe of 1917 that was Einstein's guess, very close to the present EUT model of universe. It has common with the present EUT model the proved only in 1985, and therefore unknown to Einstein, the lack of expansion, that in original Einstein's model has been acheived via introduction of [[cosmological constant]], and therefore with purely mathematical means.<ref>

The EUT is almost the same as Einstein's stationary model universe of 1917 that was Einstein's guess, very close to the present EUT model of universe. It has common with the present EUT model the proved only in 1985, and therefore unknown to Einstein, the lack of expansion, that in original Einstein's model has been achieved via introduction of [[cosmological constant]], and therefore with purely mathematical means.<ref>

And one has to remember that math is not [[science]].

And one has to remember that math is not [[science]].

To keep Einstein's field equation of this stationary model stable, and not knowing yet about the ''"[[Hubble time dilation]]"'', discovered by Edwin Hubble over a decade later, and suggesting to some astronomers that the universe might be expanding, Einstein added his ''"cosmological constant"'' to his field equation that stopped the alleged expansion. Later he called this cosmological constant ''"the biggest blunder of his life"''.  

To keep Einstein's field equation of this stationary model stable, and not knowing yet about the ''"[[Hubble time dilation]]"'', discovered by Edwin Hubble over a decade later, and suggesting to some astronomers that the universe might be expanding, Einstein added his ''"cosmological constant"'' to his field equation that stopped the alleged expansion. Later he called this cosmological constant ''"the biggest blunder of his life"''.  

When the ''"cosmological constant"'' turned out to be unnecessary, in 1985, since it turned out that the Hubble redshift is not caused by expansion of the universe but by the time runing slower at the deep space galaxies in curved space, which in EUT simulates accelerating expansion of space with acceleration  

When the ''"cosmological constant"'' turned out to be unnecessary, in 1985, since it turned out that the Hubble redshift is not caused by expansion of the universe but by the time running slower at the deep space galaxies in curved space, which in EUT simulates accelerating expansion of space with acceleration  

:<math>dH/dt=-H_o^2/2</math>  

:<math>dH/dt=-H_o^2/2</math>  

The establishment scientific journals still resist the publication of the truth about the universe (that it operates according to Einstein's plan and that the Einsteinian gravitation, does not allow the expansion of universe, does not allow the [[Big Bang]] as a way of creation of the universe).  

The establishment scientific journals still resist the publication of the truth about the universe (that it operates according to Einstein's plan and that the Einsteinian gravitation, does not allow the expansion of universe, does not allow the [[Big Bang]] as a way of creation of the universe).  

EUT sugests that the universe is stationary with Newtonian arguments based on relativity of time, which any intelligent high school student should easily comprehend and repeat the Newtonian physics contained in the following sections.

EUT suggests that the universe is stationary with Newtonian arguments based on relativity of time, which any intelligent high school student should easily comprehend and repeat the Newtonian physics contained in the following sections.

First easy to notice feature of EUT is that the universe has been always approximately the same. It has been never changing, beyond trivial movements of celestial bodies. The EUT is therefore described by the [[Perfect cosmological principle]].  

First easy to notice feature of EUT is that the universe has been always approximately the same. It has been never changing, beyond trivial movements of celestial bodies. The EUT is therefore described by the [[Perfect cosmological principle]].  

</ref>

</ref>

   

   

The EUT is explaning how the relativity of time and space (notions of non existence of absolute time and absolute space) are working in stationary, neither expanding nor contracting, eternal universe that has neither the beginning nor the end.  

The EUT is explaining how the relativity of time and space (notions of non existence of absolute time and absolute space) are working in stationary, neither expanding nor contracting, eternal universe that has neither the beginning nor the end.  

The EUT which except explaining the mechanism of gravitational force as ''inertial force'' pushing masses towards their most probable positions of minimum energy in which it reveals its quantum nature, explains also why due to relativity of time in curved space the universe ''looks as if it were expanding'', and expansion were accelerating with acceleration confirmed to one standard deviation by Supernova cosmology Project.

The EUT which except explaining the mechanism of gravitational force as ''inertial force'' pushing masses towards their most probable positions of minimum energy in which it reveals its quantum nature, explains also why due to relativity of time in curved space the universe ''looks as if it were expanding'', and expansion were accelerating with acceleration confirmed to one standard deviation by Supernova cosmology Project.

''"[[Einstein's radius of universe]]"'' <math>R_E</math> in the above equation equals roughly 13 billion light years is implied by the above value of [[Hubble constant|Hubble "constant"]] and why it should be consistent with minimum of angular diameters of galaxies between redshifts Z=1 and Z=2 which is additional test of EUT.

''"[[Einstein's radius of universe]]"'' <math>R_E</math> in the above equation equals roughly 13 billion light years is implied by the above value of [[Hubble constant|Hubble "constant"]] and why it should be consistent with minimum of angular diameters of galaxies between redshifts Z=1 and Z=2 which is additional test of EUT.

Therefore the EUT explains most of numerical results that the [[Big Bang]] cosmology is unable to explain. the EUT is in fact an extension of Einstein's general realativity but it may not be called by this name because the [[relativists]] highjacked this name for their pseudo scientific hypothesis of the [[Big Bang]] which, when used, might have caused a confusion.

Therefore, the EUT explains most of numerical results that the [[Big Bang]] cosmology is unable to explain. the EUT is in fact an extension of Einstein's general relativity but it may not be called by this name because the [[relativists]] highjacked this name for their pseudo scientific hypothesis of the [[Big Bang]] which, when used, might have caused a confusion.

===Step by step derivation of cosmological redshift===

===Step by step derivation of cosmological redshift===

I wanted to find out what is the real rate of expansion of space after subtracting the result of my calculations <math>\Delta H_o</math> from the [[Hubble constant]] <math>H_o</math> that, as I thought then, contained the total redshift: coming from the expansion of space and from [[dynamical friction]].  

I wanted to find out what is the real rate of expansion of space after subtracting the result of my calculations <math>\Delta H_o</math> from the [[Hubble constant]] <math>H_o</math> that, as I thought then, contained the total redshift: coming from the expansion of space and from [[dynamical friction]].  

I thought that I can adjust the [[Hubble constant]] <math>H_o</math> by subtracting from it <math>\Delta H_o</math> to get the real rate of expansion of space. I thought that the rate of expansion was too high since nobody bothered with making those calculations of [[dynamical friction]]. When I asked astrophysicists they all kept saying that the dynamical friction must be  "negligible" for photons since if it were not then someone would have calculated it already, and no one heard that it was ever done. Consequently no one knew how "negligible" it is.

I thought that I can adjust the [[Hubble constant]] <math>H_o</math> by subtracting from it <math>\Delta H_o</math> to get the real rate of expansion of space. I thought that the rate of expansion was too high since nobody bothered with making those calculations of [[dynamical friction]]. When I asked astrophysicists they all kept saying that the dynamical friction must be  "negligible" for photons since if it were not then someone would have calculated it already, and no one heard that it was ever done. Consequently, no one knew how "negligible" it is.

===Surprise! Surprise! No expansion?!===

===Surprise! Surprise! No expansion?!===

The question was followed by long silence during which our teach was thinking intesively. After the silence became too long, he said ''"I teach this course for four years already and nobody ever asked me such a question so I need more time to think about it, just come to me tomorrow before the lecture so I have more time to think. I'm not really a [[relativists|relativist]] but a particle physicists, I just teach this course"''.  

The question was followed by long silence during which our teach was thinking intesively. After the silence became too long, he said ''"I teach this course for four years already and nobody ever asked me such a question so I need more time to think about it, just come to me tomorrow before the lecture so I have more time to think. I'm not really a [[relativists|relativist]] but a particle physicists, I just teach this course"''.  

The question wasn't answered neither next day (''"no time"'') nor ever. I just learned that general realtivity is not a simple subject known to any physicist. So I started learning it and think about it on my own.

The question wasn't answered neither next day (''"no time"'') nor ever. I just learned that general relativity is not a simple subject known to any physicist. So I started learning it and think about it on my own.

====Getting rid of cosmological constant====

====Getting rid of cosmological constant====

First idea that came to my mind was that if the Einstein's value of [[cosmological constant]] stabilizes the universe then one should come up with such a constant that changes together with <math>R</math> (contraction of Ricci tensor) in such way that their sum vanishes. I called this hypothetical constant "contraction of ''[[Hubble tensor]]''" in honor of discoverer of [[Hubble redshift]]. To have a contraction one needs also a tensor itself so I needed a ''[[Hubble tensor]]'' as well. It would be a tensor having such properties that its contraction multiplied by half of metric would be equal exactly <math>\Lambda_E</math> (Einstein's value of [[cosmological constant]]). I just learned lately from a mathematician in my school, that such arangement is possible if the metric is non symmetric. Which it is, since it was metric required by Einstein for the spacetime.<ref>Einstein, A., ''"On the Generalized Theory of Gravitation"'', April 1950 issue of ''"Scientific American"''. Einstein's paper has been dropped from the bibliography of Einstein's papers in 1973 ''"Gravitation"'' by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler.</ref>

First idea that came to my mind was that if the Einstein's value of [[cosmological constant]] stabilizes the universe then one should come up with such a constant that changes together with <math>R</math> (contraction of Ricci tensor) in such way that their sum vanishes. I called this hypothetical constant "contraction of ''[[Hubble tensor]]''" in honor of discoverer of [[Hubble redshift]]. To have a contraction one needs also a tensor itself so I needed a ''[[Hubble tensor]]'' as well. It would be a tensor having such properties that its contraction multiplied by half of metric would be equal exactly <math>\Lambda_E</math> (Einstein's value of [[cosmological constant]]). I just learned lately from a mathematician in my school, that such arrangement is possible if the metric is non symmetric. Which it is, since it was metric required by Einstein for the spacetime.<ref>Einstein, A., ''"On the Generalized Theory of Gravitation"'', April 1950 issue of ''"Scientific American"''. Einstein's paper has been dropped from the bibliography of Einstein's papers in 1973 ''"Gravitation"'' by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler.</ref>

====Hubble tensor====

====Hubble tensor====

Furthermore to make the spacetime flat to comply with the principle of conservation of energy and momentum (that followed from [[Noether's Theorem]]) I needed the missing antisymmetric part of Ricci tensor that would represent the "curvature of time" (the term coined by [[Richard Feynman]]) that would compensate the [[curvature of space]] represented by Ricci tensor to make the spacetime flat ([[Minkowski]]). [[Hubble tensor]] seemed an ideal candidate to fill up this place.

Furthermore, to make the spacetime flat to comply with the principle of conservation of energy and momentum (that followed from [[Noether's Theorem]]) I needed the missing antisymmetric part of Ricci tensor that would represent the "curvature of time" (the term coined by [[Richard Feynman]]) that would compensate the [[curvature of space]] represented by Ricci tensor to make the spacetime flat ([[Minkowski]]). [[Hubble tensor]] seemed an ideal candidate to fill up this place.

The metric that I assumed for Einsteinian universe is non symetric and degenerate (with vanishing determinant) and yet is approximates to very neet flat [[Minkowski]] metric  

The metric that I assumed for Einsteinian universe is non symmetric and degenerate (with vanishing determinant) and yet is approximates to very neet flat [[Minkowski]] metric  

:<math>d\tau^2=dt^2-dr^2/c^2</math>.  

:<math>d\tau^2=dt^2-dr^2/c^2</math>.