Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 623:
Line 623: +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 18:08, September 16, 2016
, 18:08, September 16, 2016→Added section: Evolution and the second law
This isn't to say evolution is true, rather that this argument is not. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 11:57, 16 September 2016 (EDT)
This isn't to say evolution is true, rather that this argument is not. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 11:57, 16 September 2016 (EDT)
:This argument is quite correct. Entropy means ''"lack of order or predictability; gradual decline into disorder."''[https://www.google.com/search?q=entropy&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8] The 2nd Law states that everything goes from order to disorder, from complex to simple; you cannot avoid it. And if the earth is not a closed system, as you and too many others harp on, then why is the 2nd Law so observable everywhere you go? Does an apple get better or worse if you slice one open and leave it on the counter for a month? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 14:08, 16 September 2016 (EDT)