Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,102 bytes added ,  20:56, September 18, 2016
re
Line 13: Line 13:  
I am all for a bot for standardisation of certain forms used in wikis, but not when it interferes with the vernacular of the editors.
 
I am all for a bot for standardisation of certain forms used in wikis, but not when it interferes with the vernacular of the editors.
 
Cheers AlanE (talk) 04:44, 18 September 2016 (EDT)
 
Cheers AlanE (talk) 04:44, 18 September 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
:That makes sense--I'll try to avoid/revert such changes.  I'm still looking for a better bot solution/system, mainly because the one I have now is limited.  For example, such edit rules are stored in units, which I do not currently have the expertise to edit.  I can add/remove units, but have little more control, other than checking and approving/denying each edit.  I'll either watch for and prevent this change, or delete that unit, so it hopefully will not do that again.  I always appreciate suggestions.  This is intended to help, but if it is or will be more of a pest than a help, I'll shut it down.
 +
:I am looking into a way to work about this unit system, but I may need to create several wiki pages to store the rulesets on.  Probably no one would mind this, but I should ask first.  If it doesn't work, it might be hard to get someone to delete the pages, but, eh, that's a problem for later.  I'll see if I can customize this more.
 +
:Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 16:56, 18 September 2016 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback
19,940

edits

Navigation menu