SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + + + +
User talk:Richardm (view source)
Revision as of 16:58, September 23, 2016
, 16:58, September 23, 2016→From SamHB
:Yes, I think that would be a good idea. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 05:09, 23 September 2016 (EDT)
:Yes, I think that would be a good idea. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 05:09, 23 September 2016 (EDT)
I like what you are doing. But here are a couple of suggestions. Keep rebuttal stuff impersonal. "It is baffling that ...." is better than "I don't understand how you can say ....". Also, don't bother engaging people on talk pages (or their personal talk pages). It accomplishes nothing. Though, if someone engages you, by all means feel free to reply. In fact, I'm tempted to add to BSF a section "Communicating with Conservapedia admins on talk pages", citing Matthew 7:6 "neither cast ye your pearls before swine". Just kidding.
As for editing actual article pages, I think you know how, but, to reiterate, do not change anything above the table of contents. Do not delete anything below the table of contents. But you can move stuff around, and put in true statements, and put false statements into context. If there is something in the article that you absolutely can't stand, that's what rebuttal pages are for.
Keep up the good work. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:58, 23 September 2016 (EDT)