SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: − + + + + +
User talk:Richardm (view source)
Revision as of 00:58, September 25, 2016
, 00:58, September 25, 2016no edit summary
Keep up the good work. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:58, 23 September 2016 (EDT)
Keep up the good work. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:58, 23 September 2016 (EDT)
I agree and what you wrote is a great improvement. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 14:12, 23 September 2016 (EDT)
:I agree and what you wrote is a great improvement. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 14:12, 23 September 2016 (EDT)
I see that your peregrinations through Conservapedia have taken you into some incredibly confused wilderness; it was bound to happen sooner or later. I had a serious run-in with this person over the [[Disturbed character]] page--see the talk and history. I finally gave up; his writing is, well, disturbed. Some of his other articles are [[Fog displacement]] and [[Logic of possibility]]. I'm planning to put "delete" notices on them. Other articles are [[ABC Theory of Emotion]] and [[Gedankenexperiment]]. It's really too bad that an interesting scientific concept is so messed up.
I can kind of understand Cons ([[User:Conservative]]), and even communicate with him (excuse me, with all the many people in the "collective" that he wants us to believe he fantasizes about), but I simply have no idea how to deal with this person. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:58, 24 September 2016 (EDT)