Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 273:
Line 273: + + + + + +
Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics (view source)
Revision as of 20:17, September 25, 2016
, 20:17, September 25, 2016Replied to comment
:I will add "in the absence of intelligent intervention" to "This principle correctly predicts that heat will never flow from a cold body to a warmer one," although it is already implied.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 15:32, 25 September 2016 (EDT)
:I will add "in the absence of intelligent intervention" to "This principle correctly predicts that heat will never flow from a cold body to a warmer one," although it is already implied.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 15:32, 25 September 2016 (EDT)
Could you explain why that statement is not scientific? I thought it was but might be wrong.
The uncertainty in qm is not the reason the second law exists. How is statistical mechanics primitive? It is a highly mathematical theory. Just because a theory does not include quantum effects does not make it useless and completely wrong (if that is what you are suggesting)
What other non-scientific claims does it make.[[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 16:17, 25 September 2016 (EDT)
(username removed)