Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 720:
Line 720: + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 12:52, September 26, 2016
, 12:52, September 26, 2016→Evolution and the second law of thermodynamics
If you have a problem with my proof, then please point it out. Otherwise I shall amend the page in a few days.
If you have a problem with my proof, then please point it out. Otherwise I shall amend the page in a few days.
If you are busy, then I would appreciate it if you say, so that we settle it on the talk page and don't keep changing the article page back and forth. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 07:41, 25 September 2016 (EDT)
If you are busy, then I would appreciate it if you say, so that we settle it on the talk page and don't keep changing the article page back and forth. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 07:41, 25 September 2016 (EDT)
:Is this a true statement:
<center><big><math>\Delta E + d-T = hc</math></big></center>
:Where <math>E</math> is an elephant, <math>h</math> is the act of the elephant hanging off <math>c</math> (a cliff) while gripping <math>d</math> (a dandelion) with <math>t</math> (its trunk). Math can "prove" just about anything; if you want to balance a battleship on the spout of a tea kettle, math will "prove" to the world it can be done. But actually seeing it is something else. The battleship's anchor alone would crush that tea kettle, and the elephant will fall to the bottom of the cliff, taking the dandelion with it. Your math is not matching up with what everyone is actually seeing on a daily basis. You are not correct. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 08:52, 26 September 2016 (EDT)