Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics (view source)

Revision as of 05:02, September 27, 2016

409 bytes added ,  05:02, September 27, 2016
→‎Recent reversion by User:Aschlafly: As to the point about quantum mechanics, it provides a better understanding of the Second Law than what predated QM.
Line 289: Line 289:     
::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:01, 26 September 2016 (EDT)
 
::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:01, 26 September 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::The hypothesis that "entropy can decrease in a closed system, but it is extremely unlikely, so not observed for all practical purposes" is not science, because it is not [[falsifiable]].  As to the point about [[quantum mechanics]], it provides a better understanding of the Second Law than what predated QM.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:02, 27 September 2016 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1280650"

Navigation menu