SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 814:
Line 814: + + + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 00:56, September 29, 2016
, 00:56, September 29, 2016→Note to AlecT: new section
[[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 07:42, 27 September 2016 (EDT)
[[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 07:42, 27 September 2016 (EDT)
== Note to AlecT ==
I was about to obliterate your recent edit, though I see that Cons has done so more thoroughly than I can. And I was about to chastise you for using the crude language that you used—a crude sexual word and a word that wrongly disparages people with mental handicaps. And I was going to do it right here, rather than on your talk page, in the expectation that that talk page would soon be deleted.
I believe that the discussions of thermodynamics, evolution, cosmology, relativity, and similar topics, are being adequately handled by the competent people that we have here at Conservapedia. Notably myself, Richardm, AugustO, and a few others. None of those people are potty-mouths. We can always use more people to help with producing high-quality expositions of these topics. For all I know, you might have been a good candidate for such, if you weren't such a jerk. It's too bad. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:56, 28 September 2016 (EDT)