Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Please use section headers.
Line 909: Line 909:     
I believe that the discussions of thermodynamics, evolution, cosmology, relativity, and similar topics, are being adequately handled by the competent people that we have here at Conservapedia.  Notably myself, Richardm, AugustO, and a few others.  None of those people are potty-mouths.  We can always use more people to help with producing high-quality expositions of these topics.  For all I know, you might have been a good candidate for such, if you weren't such a jerk.  It's too bad.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:56, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
 
I believe that the discussions of thermodynamics, evolution, cosmology, relativity, and similar topics, are being adequately handled by the competent people that we have here at Conservapedia.  Notably myself, Richardm, AugustO, and a few others.  None of those people are potty-mouths.  We can always use more people to help with producing high-quality expositions of these topics.  For all I know, you might have been a good candidate for such, if you weren't such a jerk.  It's too bad.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:56, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
−
:On a personal page at Conservapedia, I posted a recent ''Scientific American'' article entitled ''Creationism invades Europe''.  It's arriving on the backs of evangelical Christian and Muslim immigrants to Europe and as a consequence of evangelicals/Muslims having more children.
     −
:With immigrants flooding into London and British native white flight out of London, I suspect increasing challenges to the evolutionary indoctrination of children in London. In 5-15 years British evolutionists could face stiff opposition to evolutionism in London. In 2011, about 44% of Londoners were white British. [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4bd95562-4379-11e2-a48c-00144feabdc0.html]
+
== Would people please stop trashing this page? ==
 +
 
 +
It's very distracting.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:49, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
   −
:Since Britain is the birthplace of Darwinism and Europe is a stronghold of evolutionism that is being chipped away at, this does not bode well for evolutionism.
+
==Some observations by [[User:Conservative]]==
 +
On a personal page at Conservapedia, I posted a recent ''Scientific American'' article entitled ''Creationism invades Europe''.  It's arriving on the backs of evangelical Christian and Muslim immigrants to Europe and as a consequence of evangelicals/Muslims having more children.  
   −
:Evolutionism being under siege may partly explain the anger of this particular evolutionist.  
+
With immigrants flooding into London and British native white flight out of London, I suspect increasing challenges to the evolutionary indoctrination of children in London. In 5-15 years British evolutionists could face stiff opposition to evolutionism in London. In 2011, about 44% of Londoners were white British. [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4bd95562-4379-11e2-a48c-00144feabdc0.html]
   −
:The evolutionary paradigm is being propped up by politics. Namely, at the present time, there are more European voters wanting public schools to teach evolution than there are opposing this matter. But the demographics of various European areas/cities is changing rapidly and causing an increase in creationism. And the 21st century demographic changes happening to Europe as a whole is favorable to the creationists as well. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:51, 29 September 2016 (EDT)
+
Since Britain is the birthplace of Darwinism and Europe is a stronghold of evolutionism that is being chipped away at, this does not bode well for evolutionism.
   −
== Would people please stop trashing this page? ==
+
Evolutionism being under siege may partly explain the anger of this particular evolutionist.
 +
 
 +
The evolutionary paradigm is being propped up by politics. Namely, at the present time, there are more European voters wanting public schools to teach evolution than there are opposing this matter. But the demographics of various European areas/cities is changing rapidly and causing an increase in creationism. And the 21st century demographic changes happening to Europe as a whole is favorable to the creationists as well. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:51, 29 September 2016 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:The ''Scientific American'' article to which you refer is presumably http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/eurocreationism/.  Though I don't know why you would be promoting an article with a subtitle "An antiscience movement once limited mostly to the U.S. is gaining ground on the eastern side of the Atlantic".  I assume you support science.  Also, I couldn't find any reference to that article on anyone's personal page at CP, or any page at all.  In any case, it's posted now.
   −
It's very distracting.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:49, 28 September 2016 (EDT)
+
:And I don't know who "this particular evolutionist" is.  It couldn't be AlecT; all we know about him is that he is a potty-mouth who uses crude language, like the "f" word.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:26, 30 September 2016 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits

Navigation menu