nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 136:
Line 136: + +
Talk:Young Earth Creationism (view source)
Revision as of 10:19, April 26, 2007
, 10:19, April 26, 2007→This article is a travesty: Which one trumps the other?
:Ah, but that's where you've fallen for the [[Worldwide Evil Science Conspiracy]]'s vile deception. Someone who read the Bible says that it says the earth is only 6000 years old, so any so-called 'discoveries' that contradict that are EVIL LIES BY [[SATAN]] [[fnord]].
:Ah, but that's where you've fallen for the [[Worldwide Evil Science Conspiracy]]'s vile deception. Someone who read the Bible says that it says the earth is only 6000 years old, so any so-called 'discoveries' that contradict that are EVIL LIES BY [[SATAN]] [[fnord]].
:You know, this is a typical example of the bias so many anti-creationists have. There are two contradictory claims, but rather than test both claims to see which one (or both) is wrong, they simply use one claim to disprove the other claim. I could just as logically claim that the estimated age of [[Stonehenge]] must be wrong, because the Earth is only 6,000 years old. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:19, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
But it must be true - Conservapedia says so on http://www.conservapedia.com/Stonehenge , honest. Maybe years lasted longer in the old days and they're only going faster know because the earth has sped up or something, a bit like how a year felt like forever when you were a child but they just fly by now. --[[User:Commandment9|Commandment9]] 21:58, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
But it must be true - Conservapedia says so on http://www.conservapedia.com/Stonehenge , honest. Maybe years lasted longer in the old days and they're only going faster know because the earth has sped up or something, a bit like how a year felt like forever when you were a child but they just fly by now. --[[User:Commandment9|Commandment9]] 21:58, 25 April 2007 (EDT)