Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:     
'''Comment:''' I am sorry, but I don't understand what you mean.  The United States is a ''democratic'' republic.  Are you saying that democracy alone is a bad form of government?  If you are then I would have to agree with you...to an extent.  After a while democracy, alone, begins to falter, as seen in ancient Athens.  But building a republic on the foundation of a democracy is a very strong government.  If you could please tell me if this was what you were getting at, it would be greatly appreciated.  [[User:David R|David R]]
 
'''Comment:''' I am sorry, but I don't understand what you mean.  The United States is a ''democratic'' republic.  Are you saying that democracy alone is a bad form of government?  If you are then I would have to agree with you...to an extent.  After a while democracy, alone, begins to falter, as seen in ancient Athens.  But building a republic on the foundation of a democracy is a very strong government.  If you could please tell me if this was what you were getting at, it would be greatly appreciated.  [[User:David R|David R]]
 +
 +
In democracy the people ''are'' the government, they propose and vote on the laws, and there is no elcted legislature.  A republic is different.  A republic is better then a democracy because it recognizes the fact that the people in general do not know enough to govern properly.  In a Republic the people choose representatives who are (hopefully) better informed and know enough to do the job.  A republic takes the strong points of democracy, (no tyrants, self government...) without some of the problems, (uninformed government, rule by popular opinion) and creates a better form of government.  that said, this debate was meant to apply to all kinds of self government, and was misnamed, it should say: "Is it even possible to install self government in a Muslim country." --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 15:47, 4 February 2007 (EST)
1,263

edits

Navigation menu