343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 263:
Line 263: + + + +
Trademarks
I can't believe how many hits this article is getting, it must be ''all over'' the interwebs. Great work, folks. [[User:Human|Human]] 01:06, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
I can't believe how many hits this article is getting, it must be ''all over'' the interwebs. Great work, folks. [[User:Human|Human]] 01:06, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
== Trademarks ==
I'm pretty sure from my editing experience at Wikipedia that the photograph placed by TMlouse (does TM mean "trademark"?) defies law. As I understand it, when a photograph includes a trademark, then the referenced material must be about that trademark for it to qualify as fair use. You can not take Pepsi-cola's trademark, either as an individual trademark or as a photograph, and place it into an article about anything except trademark itself. This article is about "scientology". The article is not about "the church of scientology" nor about the trademark of the Church. I'm pretty sure that photograph in this article is an illegal use of the photograph. If you go to Wikipedia you can trace that exact, same photograph, it was used there for a time. And removed for this exact reason. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 06:46, 26 April 2007 (EDT)