Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 359: Line 359:     
::I agree that God is not "confined" to anything. But I'm not sure there's any value to arguing the fine differences between "everything", the universe and God.  We're not philosophers, and others have explored this better than we can. I think there is some value to helping atheists understand why the question is not whether God exist or not. The real question is whether God is an omnipresent sentience or not. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 10:09, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::I agree that God is not "confined" to anything. But I'm not sure there's any value to arguing the fine differences between "everything", the universe and God.  We're not philosophers, and others have explored this better than we can. I think there is some value to helping atheists understand why the question is not whether God exist or not. The real question is whether God is an omnipresent sentience or not. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 10:09, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Everwill, your argument that god = everything is preposterous. Firstly, i do not agree with the first statement you make, that god is everything. I would like some hard proof, or at least a convincing argument that god equals everything before the first premise of your argument.
 +
 +
If, for arguements sake, we assume that your first premise is correct, then the only question is, as you say, whether everything (or god) is sentient? Again, you can say so, however i want proof. I have yet to see a plan in the universe or everything. According to the current predictions by astronomers and physcists, the universe is set to expand for an idefinete period and that eventually all the stars will run out of hydrogen and go out, and that everything will spread further and further apart at faster and faster speeds until the universe tears itself apart. Can you explain the plan in this? It displays all the theories about gravity, dark matter, quantum theory and strong and weak nuclear forces. There is nothing to show an added level of intelligence in this everything.
 +
 +
Please do not assume that your first premise is correct until you show some evidence for this, otherwise your argument is entirely invalid.
 +
 +
[[User:Bolly Ottihw|Bolly Ottihw]] 21:06, 26 April 2007
    
==Is Atheism Ridiculous?==
 
==Is Atheism Ridiculous?==
100

edits

Navigation menu