33
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: +
Talk:Intelligence testing (view source)
Revision as of 20:04, October 16, 2016
, 20:04, October 16, 2016no edit summary
I've tidied up the Wikipedia articles several times, but I saw today that the old liberal bias has crept back again. Jensen and also ''The Bell Curve'' are vilified, and Gould's POV is exalted. Gould puts words into others' mouths, and Wikipedia lets him get away with it. (I guess evolutionists like Gould can do no wrong, and conservatives can do no right, eh?) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:33, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
I've tidied up the Wikipedia articles several times, but I saw today that the old liberal bias has crept back again. Jensen and also ''The Bell Curve'' are vilified, and Gould's POV is exalted. Gould puts words into others' mouths, and Wikipedia lets him get away with it. (I guess evolutionists like Gould can do no wrong, and conservatives can do no right, eh?) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:33, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
::At some time I tried to fix Wikipedia article providing references to the relevant works of the real scientific research but all got removed so that cannot even find in edit history. If there is any single article in Wikipedia that provides clearly false, misleading and biased information, backed up only by the supporting team watching the edits, then this one article it is. [[User:H22|H22]] ([[User talk:H22|talk]]) 16:04, 16 October 2016 (EDT)