33
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: + +
Talk:Atheistic science (view source)
Revision as of 21:04, October 16, 2016
, 21:04, October 16, 2016no edit summary
:Conservative you are going off on a complete tangent totally unrelated to anything I was talking about. Can we stay on topic please? Or is thinking about that too hard for you? [[User:QuantumDude|QuantumDude]] ([[User talk:QuantumDude|talk]]) 14:02, 8 February 2016 (EST)
:Conservative you are going off on a complete tangent totally unrelated to anything I was talking about. Can we stay on topic please? Or is thinking about that too hard for you? [[User:QuantumDude|QuantumDude]] ([[User talk:QuantumDude|talk]]) 14:02, 8 February 2016 (EST)
:The article would highly benefit from more citations, including the reference to the current official position of the Church. Some research works brought intermediate, still questionable conclusions with potentially so nasty social consequences, that asking to interpret with care may be reasonable. But this probably more applies to various forms of scientific racism, abortion and things the like. It is really an explanation required why black holes, wormholes, aliens, dark matter and magnetic butterflies as selected as examples or why and how do they promote atheism in any way. Hence why the article may address a real thing, it seems completely out of focus. [[User:H22|H22]] ([[User talk:H22|talk]]) 17:04, 16 October 2016 (EDT)