| Line 31: |
Line 31: |
| | | | |
| | I warned the other Sysops/Admins and the Director of Conservapedia about Terryeo. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:37, 26 April 2007 (EDT) | | I warned the other Sysops/Admins and the Director of Conservapedia about Terryeo. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:37, 26 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == What you have accomplished, Joyous == |
| | + | You begin to edit a couple of days ago. You posted to Conservative's talk page, rather than attempt to talk with me. You find legal threat where I make no legal threat. You insist that scientology, somehow, by not "supporting" faith, acts against faith. You posted:<br /> |
| | + | My only real problem is that he seems to focus on removal of information, rather than addition of information, and creates complexity rather than simplicity. |
| | + | * His (IMO) bizarre focus on the photo issue is problematic |
| | + | * His desire to equate the concept of "thetan" with Christian soul is problematic, given one is admittedly materialistic and one is divine. |
| | + | * His bizarre rambling statements |
| | + | * His constant referring back to legal issues, which should be irrelevant. |
| | + | * He denies the centrality of faith as a irreconcilable difference between Christianity and Scientology, despite their own literature.<br /> I have tried to reply to you on each of these issues. In fact, I have stated several times that there is no belief in scientology and therefore, no "irreconcilable difference". Further, I have told you that many Christians are Scientologists and visa versa. I realize I am speaking in the face of websites that say otherwise, but the irreconcilable facts speak for themselves. I have given it a good effort, Joyous. Now, thanks in large measure to your efforts, I find myself considered to be a "contentious, problematic editor". This is what you have accomplished. If it is what you intended, then your work is nearly done. Happy Ho Ho's. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 09:44, 26 April 2007 (EDT) |