Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
372 bytes added ,  15:21, April 26, 2007
Line 22: Line 22:     
I'll discuss this in class tomorrow.  Your criticism is right, and Thammersmith's response is right also.  The mistake was mine.  Maybe this week we'll rerun the "dilemma" with a different benefit scheme to see if the outcome is different.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:36, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
 
I'll discuss this in class tomorrow.  Your criticism is right, and Thammersmith's response is right also.  The mistake was mine.  Maybe this week we'll rerun the "dilemma" with a different benefit scheme to see if the outcome is different.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:36, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Mr Schlafly, your benefits made perfect sense for the type of dilemna it was. To change it so that the nash equilibrium would come out as they both confess wouldn't make sense. Because we're assuming that the only evidence that can be aginst them is their own confession, then it would make most sense for them to get any jail time for not both not confessing.
 +
 +
Daniel N
    
== Questions on Week 8 Homework ==
 
== Questions on Week 8 Homework ==
Block, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta
289

edits

Navigation menu