Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 390:
Line 390: + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 05:14, November 10, 2016
, 05:14, November 10, 2016Conservapedia observed more than two weeks before the election that three effects will boost Donald Trump above his poll numbers. Conervapedia was right and the liberal experts were wrong.
|The truth came out, but liberal denial persisted and some continued to defend Ryan Lochte.
|The truth came out, but liberal denial persisted and some continued to defend Ryan Lochte.
|August 19, 2016
|August 19, 2016
|-
|October 21, 2016
|''Conservapedia'' observed that three effects will boost [[Donald Trump]] above his poll numbers in the election:
*Brexit effect - 5 point error by polls due to media bias causing people be afraid to be candid with pollsters
*Arnold Schwarzenegger/Reagan effect - 8-10 points better than polling,[68] due to media bias and also advantage enjoyed by Republican entertainers
*Scott Brown effect - many points due to much greater enthusiasm<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&oldid=1284862</ref>
|sarcastic criticism and [[liberal denial]]
|Donald Trump exceed the polling by about four points, and won an election that [[liberal]] experts predicted with great confidence that he would lose.
|November 8, 2016
|}
|}