5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 63:
Line 63: + +
Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge (view source)
Revision as of 03:26, November 14, 2016
, 03:26, November 14, 2016→Last shall be first, and the first shall be last
:I would like to hear an argument in support of this, but before someone does, it should not be deleted. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:13, 13 November 2016 (EST)
:I would like to hear an argument in support of this, but before someone does, it should not be deleted. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:13, 13 November 2016 (EST)
::I deleted it (before the deletion was reverted) because the original objection to it is over 3 years old, with no responses in favor of keeping it. How long are we supposed to wait before deleting such nonsense? Absurd entries like this just make the page into a joke. I would not be surprised if some of these examples were put in by people trying to do just that. [[User:Erniecohen|Erniecohen]] ([[User talk:Erniecohen|talk]]) 22:26, 13 November 2016 (EST)
== Pi to one significant figure ==
== Pi to one significant figure ==