Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,396
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: − +
Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge (view source)
Revision as of 04:50, November 14, 2016
, 04:50, November 14, 2016→Last shall be first, and the first shall be last
::I deleted it (before the deletion was reverted) because the original objection to it is over 3 years old, with no responses in favor of keeping it. How long are we supposed to wait before deleting such nonsense? Absurd entries like this just make the page into a joke. I would not be surprised if some of these examples were put in by people trying to do just that. [[User:Erniecohen|Erniecohen]] ([[User talk:Erniecohen|talk]]) 22:26, 13 November 2016 (EST)
::I deleted it (before the deletion was reverted) because the original objection to it is over 3 years old, with no responses in favor of keeping it. How long are we supposed to wait before deleting such nonsense? Absurd entries like this just make the page into a joke. I would not be surprised if some of these examples were put in by people trying to do just that. [[User:Erniecohen|Erniecohen]] ([[User talk:Erniecohen|talk]]) 22:26, 13 November 2016 (EST)
:::Thanks for deleting it. There is no need to put in entries that stretch the meaning of the text beyond what is intended. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:49, 13 November 2016 (EST)
:::Thanks for deleting it. There is no need to put in entries which are not clear examples.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:50, 13 November 2016 (EST)
== Pi to one significant figure ==
== Pi to one significant figure ==