Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 399:
Line 399: + + + + + +
Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 23:48, November 16, 2016
, 23:48, November 16, 2016Conservapedia observed that the second letter by James Comey to exonerate Hillary Clinton was actually helpful to Donald Trump, because it fed the backlash among the grassroots at the preferential treatment given to Hillary.
|Donald Trump exceeded the polling by about four points, and won an election that [[liberal]] experts predicted with great confidence that he would lose.
|Donald Trump exceeded the polling by about four points, and won an election that [[liberal]] experts predicted with great confidence that he would lose.
|November 8, 2016
|November 8, 2016
|-
|November 7, 2016
|''Conservapedia'' observed that the second letter by James Comey to exonerate [[Hillary Clinton]] was actually helpful to [[Donald Trump]], because it fed the backlash among the [[grassroots]] at the preferential treatment given to Hillary.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&oldid=1288160</ref>
|[[Free trade]]rs at the ''Wall Street Journal'' falsely assert that the letter helps Hillary.
|In the post-election analysis, [[Hillary]]'s campaign confirmed that the letter hurt her even though it purportedly exonerated her.
|November 16, 2016
|}
|}