Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 937:
Line 937: − − ==Proposal== − Add Conservapedia as a counterexample to evolution. If evolution actually made improvements to organisms over time this website wouldn't exist, since the defective genes causing people to be sufficiently retarded that they would maintain it would have long been bred out. Clearly that hasn't happened, thus disproving evolution. [[User:MaxZ|MaxZ]] ([[User talk:MaxZ|talk]]) 20:00, 19 November 2016 (EST)
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 01:54, November 20, 2016
, 01:54, November 20, 2016Remove nonsense clearly intended to mock Conservapedia.
::But my guess is that the prospects of creationism is understated by academics as they have not taken into account sound scholarship about [[desecularization]] such as the research done by [[Eric Kaufmann]]. In addition, they are not privy to the plans of the leading creationist organizations and moderately successful creationist organizations nor have they taken the time to interview their leaders. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:33, 30 September 2016 (EDT)
::But my guess is that the prospects of creationism is understated by academics as they have not taken into account sound scholarship about [[desecularization]] such as the research done by [[Eric Kaufmann]]. In addition, they are not privy to the plans of the leading creationist organizations and moderately successful creationist organizations nor have they taken the time to interview their leaders. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:33, 30 September 2016 (EDT)