[[Image:Bahnsen.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]] became known as "the man [[atheism|atheists]] fear most" due to [[Michael Martin]]'s cancellation of their scheduled debate.<ref>[http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/Bahnsen.htm Bahsen at the Stein debate] by John Frame</ref><ref>[http://simpleapologetics.com/thegreatdebate.html The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein]</ref>]]
+
[[Image:Bahnsen.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]] became known as "the man [[atheism|atheists]] fear most" due to [[Michael Martin]]'s cancellation of their scheduled debate.<ref>[http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/Bahnsen.htm Bahsen at the Stein debate] by John Frame</ref><ref>[http://simpleapologetics.com/thegreatdebate.html The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein]</ref>]]
Dr. Georgia Purdom and Dr. [[Jason Lisle]] wrote in an article entitled ''Morality and the Irrationality of an Evolutionary Worldview'':
Dr. Georgia Purdom and Dr. [[Jason Lisle]] wrote in an article entitled ''Morality and the Irrationality of an Evolutionary Worldview'':
{{Cquote|Christian philosopher Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]] (1948–95) states, “What does the unbeliever [person who rejects the biblical God] mean by ‘good,’ or by what standard does the unbeliever determine what counts as ‘good’ (so that ‘evil’ is accordingly defined or identified)? What are the presuppositions in terms of which the unbeliever makes any moral judgments whatsoever?” Although unbelievers may classify actions as good or evil, they do not have an ultimate foundation for defining what is good and evil.
{{Cquote|Christian philosopher Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]] (1948–95) states, “What does the unbeliever [person who rejects the biblical God] mean by ‘good,’ or by what standard does the unbeliever determine what counts as ‘good’ (so that ‘evil’ is accordingly defined or identified)? What are the presuppositions in terms of which the unbeliever makes any moral judgments whatsoever?” Although unbelievers may classify actions as good or evil, they do not have an ultimate foundation for defining what is good and evil.
Line 19:
Line 19:
The Christian worldview accounts not only for morality but also for why evolutionists behave the way they do. Even those who have no basis for morality within their own professed worldview nonetheless hold to a moral code; this is because in their heart of hearts they really do know the God of [[creation]], despite their profession to the contrary. Scripture tells us that everyone knows the biblical God, but that they suppress the truth about God (Romans 1:18-21).<ref>[https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/georgia-purdom/2012/02/16/do-atheists-have-a-foundation-for-morality/ ''Morality and the Irrationality of an Evolutionary Worldview'']
The Christian worldview accounts not only for morality but also for why evolutionists behave the way they do. Even those who have no basis for morality within their own professed worldview nonetheless hold to a moral code; this is because in their heart of hearts they really do know the God of [[creation]], despite their profession to the contrary. Scripture tells us that everyone knows the biblical God, but that they suppress the truth about God (Romans 1:18-21).<ref>[https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/georgia-purdom/2012/02/16/do-atheists-have-a-foundation-for-morality/ ''Morality and the Irrationality of an Evolutionary Worldview'']
by Dr. Georgia Purdom and Dr. Jason Lisle on May 13, 2009</ref>}}
by Dr. Georgia Purdom and Dr. Jason Lisle on May 13, 2009</ref>}}