Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
question about disqualified pages
Line 5: Line 5:     
::Internet users generally don't like stub articles. And when you look at the search engines results for various searches, generally speaking stub articles are not listed on the first page of results. So if we want new readers/editors, I think we should have contests which encourage editors to create articles that are least 5 or more paragraphs long. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:30, 1 August 2016 (EDT)
 
::Internet users generally don't like stub articles. And when you look at the search engines results for various searches, generally speaking stub articles are not listed on the first page of results. So if we want new readers/editors, I think we should have contests which encourage editors to create articles that are least 5 or more paragraphs long. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:30, 1 August 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
==October articles question==
 +
Hi, I'm not trying to complain (I seem to be ahead anyway at the moment) but is there any particular reason that [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] and [[Digital projector]] were disqualified?  Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 21:16, 27 November 2016 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback
19,806

edits

Navigation menu