Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 65: Line 65:     
Opinion polls are not worthy of mention in an encyclopedia, except maybe to provide background information for a specific political event, such as an election.  If someone is reading this article two years from now, do you think the democrat Congress's approval rating in the second week of April 2007 will be relevant to them?  Of course not.  I'm not going to summarily remove it now, but I suspect most intelligent people will agree with me that it doesn't belong.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 14:07, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Opinion polls are not worthy of mention in an encyclopedia, except maybe to provide background information for a specific political event, such as an election.  If someone is reading this article two years from now, do you think the democrat Congress's approval rating in the second week of April 2007 will be relevant to them?  Of course not.  I'm not going to summarily remove it now, but I suspect most intelligent people will agree with me that it doesn't belong.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 14:07, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I'm more than happy to let it stay...provided we add the same polling data to the Republican Party page and the George W. Bush page. We are supposed to be even-handed here, right?--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 14:23, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
433

edits

Navigation menu