Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 23:
Line 23: − +
Talk:Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 21:50, November 30, 2016
, 21:50, November 30, 2016→Cristie and Palin
:The way that mathematical probabilities work, nobody, including Palin, has an absolute zero probability of being nominated. An absolute zero probability for an uncertainty is, by definition, impossible.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:05, 22 November 2011 (EST)
:The way that mathematical probabilities work, nobody, including Palin, has an absolute zero probability of being nominated. An absolute zero probability for an uncertainty is, by definition, impossible.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:05, 22 November 2011 (EST)
::Wouldn't that mean that we would have to cite every American above 35 as a potential nominee if the only criteria is that the person in question has a probability of being nominated that is greater than 0?
::Wouldn't that mean that we would have to cite every American above 35 as a potential nominee if the only criteria is that the person in question has a probability of being nominated that is greater than 0? - unsigned addition by User:Conservapediabias
== Newt Gingrich ==
== Newt Gingrich ==