Changes

===== Example: Judge Steven Colloton is not pro-life =====

===== Example: Judge Steven Colloton is not pro-life =====

Judge Colloton is not [[pro-life]], and has ruled '''''three''''' times against the pro-life position.  He has apparently never said anything publicly that is [[pro-life]], and the overwhelming majority of attorneys having his background are pro-''Roe v. Wade''.  He attended a law school that is very pro-[[abortion]], the same as candidate Justice Charles Canady, but unlike Canady Judge Colloton has not spoken out against the abortion.  In addition to this, Judge Colloton has affirmatively written or voted in favor of abortionists or against pro-lifers on at least three separate occasions, as follows.

Judge Colloton is not [[pro-life]], and has ruled '''''three''''' times against the pro-life position.  He has apparently never even said anything publicly that is [[pro-life]].  He attended a law school that is overwhelmingly pro-[[abortion]], the same law school that candidate Justice Charles Canady attended, but unlike Canady Judge Colloton has not spoken out against abortion.  In addition, Judge Colloton has affirmatively written or voted in favor of abortionists or against pro-lifers on at least three separate occasions, as follows.

In a long-running case from South Dakota, Judge Colloton refused to join Judge Gruender's decision in favor of a [[pro-life]] South Dakota law.  ''Planned Parenthood Minn. v. Rounds'', 686 F.3d 889 (8th Cir. 2012) (''en banc'').<ref>https://casetext.com/case/planned-parenthood-minn-nd-sd-v-rounds (search on "concurring in part")</ref>  Instead, Colloton wrote a concurrence that essentially gutted the value of the pro-life South Dakota law in two ways, while purportedly concurring with the outcome.

In a long-running case from South Dakota, Judge Colloton refused to join Judge Gruender's decision in favor of a [[pro-life]] South Dakota law.  ''Planned Parenthood Minn. v. Rounds'', 686 F.3d 889 (8th Cir. 2012) (''en banc'').<ref>https://casetext.com/case/planned-parenthood-minn-nd-sd-v-rounds (search on "concurring in part")</ref>  Instead, Colloton wrote a concurrence that essentially gutted the value of the pro-life South Dakota law in two ways, while purportedly concurring with the outcome.