Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + + + + + + + + +
not really president because Hillary got more votes?
::Alright, I've uploaded it. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 00:35, 17 September 2016 (EDT)
::Alright, I've uploaded it. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 00:35, 17 September 2016 (EDT)
==Undermining his legitimacy==
In addition to claiming that Russia influenced the election, some are pointing out that Trump didn't get the popular vote - as if this implies
*he's not really the president;
*he shouldn't be; or,
*he simply has no mandate
Should we include this (implied) argument in the lede? Or create a section on detractors? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:38, 18 December 2016 (EST)