Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 163:
Line 163: + +
Talk:Second Amendment (view source)
Revision as of 12:09, December 24, 2016
, 12:09, December 24, 2016→Second Amendment question regarding the French Revolution
Getting back on topic, even if they could do this, it has no relation to the second amendment. The people have a right to have and bear arms, and to form a militia. Neither the individual nor the militia will have the resources to use such technology, so it would be the federal military using this, not those people. In face, the second amendment could prove vital in the prevention of such technological oppression, because the people still retain some small military strength, and therefore cannot pushed around so easily.<br />
Getting back on topic, even if they could do this, it has no relation to the second amendment. The people have a right to have and bear arms, and to form a militia. Neither the individual nor the militia will have the resources to use such technology, so it would be the federal military using this, not those people. In face, the second amendment could prove vital in the prevention of such technological oppression, because the people still retain some small military strength, and therefore cannot pushed around so easily.<br />
Anyway, I'm rambling again, but I hope this at least partially answers your second question. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 14:07, 28 November 2016 (EST)
Anyway, I'm rambling again, but I hope this at least partially answers your second question. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 14:07, 28 November 2016 (EST)
:I was more concerned with the whole "America descending into chaos and become the wild west again with no law or order" bit as a result of the Patriots being destroyed, but I guess I'll settle with that for now (that being said, I still need an answer that specifically addressed that whole wild west lawlessness thing in the future, as that's the one I'm most concerned with, since the way Ocelot was talking made it seem as though the second amendment, or at least getting rid of gun control, actually encourages people to behave like psychopaths and slaughter each other for fun.).
:And I might as well ask this, since I don't think I got an answer for that bit, can you explain how the [[Cordeliers Club]] can get away with the kinds of stuff regarding using shotguns to execute people with crowds being entertained by that and still claim they were inspired by our founding documents (something that even Conservapedia claimed was the case), and also at the same time outrank the Jacobins in terms of being radical? [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 07:09, 24 December 2016 (EST)