Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: − +
Runaway greenhouse effect (view source)
Revision as of 22:43, April 26, 2007
, 22:43, April 26, 2007current models depend heavily on undemonstrated positive feedback factors to predict high levels of warming
[[Richard Lindzen]] wrote:
[[Richard Lindzen]] wrote:
:It is still of interest to ask what we would expect a doubling of carbon dioxide to do. A large number of calculations show that if this is all that happened, we might expect a warming of from .5 to 1.2 degrees centigrade. The general consensus is that such warming would present few, if any, problems. [http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html]
:It is still of interest to ask what we would expect a doubling of carbon dioxide to do. A large number of calculations show that if this is all that happened, we might expect a warming of from .5 to 1.2 degrees centigrade. The general consensus is that such warming would present few, if any, problems. ... current models depend heavily on undemonstrated positive feedback factors to predict high levels of warming. [http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html]
[[Category:Ecology]]
[[Category:Ecology]]
[[Category:earth science]]
[[Category:earth science]]